data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a3c/60a3cbcf31a0393aaa5e7eb6beb5d952bbf72803" alt="Interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dd90/2dd90c6d0be6cf08833ba9dffcd9762d1e26819d" alt="interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ef4f/9ef4f595f99510b7566833bd5b7fb0d5c760dfd5" alt="interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro"
So realistically, using 5 cores at 2.93Ghz is about the same as 4 cores on the 3.33GHz. Thus, on the 8 core model, 4.5 cores must be utilized just to achieve the same performance, and that ignores the overhead of more CPU cores, software limitations, etc. The 3.33Ghz model has a 13% clock-speed advantage over the 8-core 2.93GHz.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ec45/8ec455664ee432936d32cdf17a639d416af55449" alt="interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro"
The 8-core model is not available at 3.33GHz, but a quad-core model is available. The fastest 8-core Mac Pro to be had as of May 2010 is the Mac Pro Nehalem 2.93GHz (see the in-depth review). This special report takes a photographer’s viewpoint on the Apple Mac Pro, asking whether eight cores is really better than four. Send Feedback Related: hard drive, Mac Pro, memory, RAID, SSDĪ Mac Pro is expensive enough to begin with, but paying more for the same performance is silly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a3c/60a3cbcf31a0393aaa5e7eb6beb5d952bbf72803" alt="Interior images 2010 2.93 ghz 8 core mac pro"